Tuesday, October 22, 2019

Harvard Conflict Resolution Program Agrees

Collaborative Divorce may be Best!

In an article published recently by The Program on Mediation of Harvard Law School's daily blog, researchers studied 369 divorcing couples in Belgium to see what worked best, comparing Litigation and Mediation. The results were measured for success as rated by the couples themselves.

"Participants who engaged in mediation reported that they reached higher quality agreements, as measured by how tailored, fair, comprehensive, and clear the agreement was."

What does this study reveal for divorcing couples in the USA?

 Many couples are unhappy with Litigation because they feel they never get to "tell their side" and the judge just talks to the lawyers and makes decisions without all the facts. Litigation is costly. At the end of the day, time is required and more time is always needed to show just one more piece of evidence.

In Mediation, many times couples feel pressured to finish everything at the end of a long day, but the results remain largely in the control of the parties. 

"Overall, the results suggest that couples would be wise to be aided by professionals who believe that reducing conflict and encouraging an open dialogue are more likely to promote a satisfactory divorce than a straightforward competitive approach would. Indeed, perhaps seeking the best of both worlds, some divorcing couples are turning to a process known as collaborative law, which combines a lawyer’s advocacy and legal know-how with the problem-solving orientation of mediation."

I like collaborative law for all the benefits of Mediation, along with the added benefit of time and consideration. People need time to review impacts of decisions and must be advised as to alternative courses available.

You can link to the article below. You can also call me, 407-645-3297.

"https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/mediation/mediation-negotiating-a-more-satisfactory-divorce/?utm_source=WhatCountsEmail&utm_medium=daily&utm_date=2019-10-21-13-30-00&mqsc=E4095613

Friday, October 18, 2019

Collaborative Divorce - a Comment


The collaborative process seeks to insulate and limit the role of the collaborative lawyers and retained experts in order to ensure that a party cannot attempt to use the collaborative process to gain tactical advantage. 

Collaborative lawyers and experts in a collaborative process necessarily learn a great deal about the parties and their goals and interests, as is intended to facilitate an agreed upon resolution of the dispute which is beneficial to all parties. It is because of this unusual access that separately and jointly retained experts have to the parties and to all information, that retained experts are precluded from testifying as fact or expert witnesses in any adversarial proceeding among any of the parties to the dispute. Likewise, retained experts work product and opinions are not discoverable in an adversarial proceeding. 

Consequently, a party should not engage any person as a retained expert that the party might wish to use as a testifying expert in an adversarial proceeding among the parties. If the parties want to introduce the findings of a retained expert in an adversarial proceeding, they may do so by stipulation. 

Why is a Collaborative Process Best for High Asset Divorces? Because the process itself promotes resolution rather than adversarial argument. Once the parties have ALL the Information, they are free to choose a resolution they desire, rather than being forced to fight every minor battle for some perceived advantage only to be encouraged to fight more for more advantage so they can fight for more. 

Monday, September 9, 2019

Probate Fees and Costs in Florida - Glad you asked!


Thanks to Veronica Baxter, a writer, blogger, and legal assistant working primarily for Philadelphia civil appeals lawyer Todd Mosser, Esq., for putting together this article. 

Attorney Fees for Probate in Florida

Prospective clients invariably ask, how much will probating a will cost? The answer is, it depends. This article will tell you the potential fees relative to the size of the estate and define ordinary and exceptional legal services.

Attorney’s fees are usually the largest expense in probate. The attorney for the personal representative of an estate is entitled to “reasonable compensation from estate assets.” The attorney is paid from the assets of the estate, not by any individual.  Although the attorney and the personal representative will sign an agreement regarding fees, the court can override that agreement if it deems that the fees are not “reasonable.”

Attorney Fees for Probate Must Be “Reasonable”

The issue of whether attorney fees are reasonable does not often arise in Florida because Florida code provides guidance on fees for “ordinary service” based upon the value of the estate:

1.    Estate valued $40K or less - fee $1,500
2.    Over $40K to 70K - fee $2,250
3.    Over $70K to $100K - fee $3K
4.    Over $100 to $1M - fee $3K 3% estate value over $100K
5.    Over $1M to $3M - fee $30K plus 2.5% estate value over $1M
6.    Over $3M to $5M - fee $50K plus 2% value over $3M
7.    Over $5M to $10M - fee $90K plus 1.5% value over $5M
8.    Over $10M - fee $165K plus 1% value over $10M.

But there are circumstances under which this statutory scheme produces unreasonable attorney fees.

Unreasonable Attorney Fees for Probate in Florida

Let’s say the Smith estate is comprised only of $10,000 in a bank account, and the Jones estate is comprised only of $1,000,000 in a bank account. The work involved in probating these two estates is comparable, but the Smith attorney would receive $1,500, and the Jones attorney would receive $30K. Is it reasonable for the Jones attorney to be compensated so much more than the Smith attorney under the statutory scheme?

Probably not. It is not mandatory that the statutory fee be paid, and under these circumstances, the personal representative and the attorney should discuss what fee is reasonable prior to signing a retainer agreement. Many estate attorneys use a flat-fee system based upon the work required to avoid any unfairness arising from the statutory scheme.

The Florida Statutory Scheme Applies to “Ordinary” Services

Ordinary legal services are typically included in the base probate fee and are services such as:

     Review and analysis of testamentary documents;
     Explanation and advice regarding testamentary documents;
     Preparation of any court filings;
     Arranging for the appointment of the client as personal representative (PR);
     Preparation and service of the required notice upon interested persons;
     Advising PR regarding obligations to the court, interested persons;
     Advising PR regarding procedural requirements;
     Advising PR regarding duty to locate, protect, insure, and otherwise manage assets of the estate;
     Advising PR regarding the prudent investor rule;
     Advising PR about duty to the estate’s creditors;
     Advising PR about clearing title and tax liens;
     Advising PR about ethical responsibilities such as avoiding self-dealing, conflicts of interest;
     Advising PR of duty of impartiality and obligations to creditors and beneficiaries.

Attorney Fee for “Extraordinary” Services In Florida

What is “extraordinary service”? This varies case-to-case but might include any unanticipated work that arises such as:

     Will contests;
     Will construction;
     Court proceedings for determination of beneficiaries;
     Contested claims;
     Elective share proceedings;
     Apportionment of estate taxes;
     Proceeding for the substitution or removal of a personal representative (PR);
     Objection to accounting or other act of the PR;
     Any other adversarial proceeding or litigation by or against the estate or the PR.

Fees for services such as providing tax advice, preparing tax returns for the estate, and selling any real property might also be considered extraordinary.

In January of 2018 a Florida court determined that the following were not “extraordinary services:”

     an outside attorney locating 53 interested persons for the purpose of notice;
     an outside attorney striking a late claim;
     an outside attorney’s review of an income tax return that was already reviewed  by the personal representative and a CPA;
     outside attorney’s paralegal performing administrative secretarial work such as preparing mailings, processing paperwork, scheduling conferences, and hearings.

The court held that “while parties have the right to employ as many lawyers as they choose, the Court will not assess lawyer fees for or against any party for more than one lawyer for a matter in which no more than one lawyer is required.”

Other Costs in Probate in Florida

Costs would include the cost of items such as court filing fees and publication fees, as well as the cost of actions such as accounting fees if needed.  These can vary widely depending upon the complexity of the estate.

Every probate matter will incur the filing fee for the filing of the Last Will and Testament and the Notice of Administration.

Is Probate Necessary in Florida?

Whether it is necessary to probate a will depends upon the value and complexity of the estate as well as the nature of the assets of the estate. If an estate has no real property and the only assets in the estate are exempt from creditors’ claims or don’t exceed the amount of final expenses, probate may not be necessary.  This is called disposition without administration.  In this case, you can avoid paying attorneys fees for probate.

Certain assets do not need to be probated under Florida law. For example, if the decedent owned a car, title to that car can transfer to heirs without being probated. If the decedent owned property as a joint tenant, the property passes to the other joint tenant automatically, such as when a married couple owns real property or a joint bank account. Assets for which the decedent designated a beneficiary such as a bank account, a retirement account, and life insurance proceeds pass automatically to the designated beneficiary.

Also, for “small estates” (those worth $75,000 or less) the probate process is streamlined pursuant to summary administration.

About the Author
Veronica Baxter is a writer, blogger, and legal assistant working primarily for Philadelphia civil appeals lawyer Todd Mosser, Esq.


Tuesday, July 30, 2019

Harvard Law Recommends Collaborative Principles

My boss likes the Harvard Law School Program on Negotiation. I do too.


Today there was a note on the daily blog about Integrative Negotiations: Dispute Resolution Through Joint Fact-Finding. https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/conflict-resolution/dispute-resolution-through-joint-fact-finding/?utm_source=WhatCountsEmail&utm_medium=daily&utm_date=2019-07-30-13-30-00&mqsc=E4074015


Wow.


That is a Harvard Law way to say, Collaborative Neutrals! Love Collaborative Law!


Make decisions for yourself rather than making the Judge decide.

Friday, April 19, 2019

The WHY and HOW of Conscious Uncoupling


Amazon CEO, Jeff Bezos’ net worth of $137 Billion led to the National Enquirer putting out pictures and notes about his affair. The Divorce proceedings were remarkably less “in the news.” In fact, the only public notice came when settlement was entered awarding his wife more than $37 Billion, and the couple wishing each other long and happy lives as they go their separate ways.  Actress and Goop Founder, Gwyneth Paltrow made “Conscious Uncoupling” an interesting addition to our lexicon, but then Ben Afleck and Jennifer Garner separated in a mutually admirable way and people ask how?
Divorcing partners are increasingly asking about Collaborative Divorce, even if they do not know that proper term. People say, “I don’t want to fight; we still want to be friends,” or “We both really want what’s best for the children.” So what is Collaborative Divorce? The International Academy of Collaborative Professionals says this: Collaborative Divorce is a voluntary dispute resolution process in which parties settle without resort to litigation.
Locally, the collaborative attorneys work through a process encouraging the parties to sign a collaborative participation agreement describing the nature and scope of the matter; to voluntarily disclose all relevant or material information necessary for decisions, and to agree to use good faith efforts to reach mutually acceptable solutions. Each party has a lawyer or “coach” whose representation terminates upon resort to any contested court proceeding, Litigation. The parties also engage professional Neutrals in areas of mental health and finances to administer the Collaborative process. The parties may jointly engage other experts as needed to help them explore all available options for a mutually agreeable uncoupling of their lives. By providing the support and guidance of many years of professional training and experience, Collaborative Professionals help the parties to complete their divorce without going to court to have a judge decide what is “right” for their family by encouraging  the  use of child and financial specialists all working together on a team.
·         After many years of “No Fault” Divorce, Collaboration began to allow people to negotiate a mutually acceptable resolution without having courts decide issues. Collaboration maintains open lines of communication and encourages information sharing. These allow the parties to create shared solutions acknowledging the highest priorities of all.
·          
·         Whether Collaborative Divorce is right for you will depend on many factors; however, seasoned professionals who have practiced for many years observing thousands of divorces are turning to  Collaboration in increasing numbers.
Uncoupling or ending any long-term relationship is a sensitive and personal matter. No single approach is right for everyone; however, there are alternatives and many couples find Collaborative Divorce to be a welcome alternative to the often destructive, and usually very expensive aspects of courtroom litigation.
How to decide?  If the following values are important to you, Collaborative Divorce is likely to be a workable option for you:
·         I want us to communicate with a tone of respect.
·         I want to prioritize the needs of our children.
·         My needs and those of my spouse/partner require equal consideration, and I will listen objectively.
·         I believe that working creatively and cooperatively resolves issues.
·         It is important to reach beyond today’s frustration and pain to plan for the future.
·         I can behave ethically toward my spouse/partner.
·         I choose to maintain control of the divorce/separation process with my spouse/partner, and not relegate it to the courts.
If this approach reflects your own thinking, I suggest you talk to a Collaboratively Trained Divorce Lawyer about your own situation. A Collaborative professional can help you decide if Conscious Uncoupling is the right alternative for you and your family.

Morning will come.

Morning will come.
No matter how dark the night!